Hm, I've never noticed much of a change, really ^^;;.

Either way, though, my favourite PA comic of all time is the one where Gabe's managed to destroy their backup drive.  I laughed so hard and then felt really bad when I read the NewsPost.

(Ir)responsibility

It's a link.

Or at least it should be...

whats really nice about Nanna's life is the actual story
because through the hole thing it showed fielings of Nanna and when you finish it you are so happy for her and that really captures you into the comics

and thank you ben and stefanie (i dont know how to spell your name) for intodusing me
to the webcomics i havent read a lot of them but i am staring to like them more and more

Babblefish wrote:

---

....storyline?

---

Right now, your opinion holds no water as, frankly, I don't believe you read a goddamn bit of many of the comics up there.

Now, if you want to actually take an hour or two and read up on one or two, THEN come back and argue on the themes with us, you be my guest. Until then, you're a retarded duck in the midst of drowning.

I know that. You're the one trying to compare Nana's Life to Sluggy. That doesn't work; two different types of comics, two different kinds of humor.

Now, as I was pointing out - because I WAS paying attention - you're basically saying Nana's life has no humor nor storyline; this is because you have not finished the comic. Come back when you have, newbie.

did u finish it ?

I think too much for my own good. Please make your point.

 

I know they are different, but all I'm saying is that Sluggy is better!  They ARE in differing categories, but that doesn't change it.

All of you need help.

For the last time, I know that they are different. The point is that I said Sluggy was entertaining. Plus, I can only force myself to read so much of Nana's Life, and I didn't have to read EVERY SINGLE COMIC of Sluggy Freelance to notice that it DOES have HUMOR, etc.


It's like you only see what you want to see. I'm a cynic, I see things how the ARE, not how they should be. You people practically cling to this thing for dear life, fighting everything I say. Whatever, if you have some insane worship-Nana's Life-pshyco-fettish or something, leave ME out of it. (Feel free to pull OTHERS in)

.....

Those are NOT the only definitions for it.

Maybe they are....does not matter. The point is (Wikipedia baby!) that the greek philosophers of this group challenged 'socities values', including popular belief.

This is generally a negatively overtoned philosophy, since cynics often point out what people don't want to hear. This includes what people try to ignore; they are the muckrakers of society and don't care much for what other people think unless they aren't basing it on what the point of arguement is (this mostly includes the 'public secrets' that people wish they really didn't know).It also helps if the subject matter of their debate has evidence for what they are trying to get across, not just hear-say and mob-behavioral jargin. ('jargin' is a fun word)

In the modern world, people who have a similar outlook or philosophy are reffered to as cynics. The point of this is, I am a cynic, not a greek philosopher, but one who has a similar outlook of what they did, to the point of which it can be referenced to the modern world.